COLLECTION NAME:
Genizah Collection
mediaCollectionId
ManchesterDev~95~2
Genizah Collection
Collection
true
Reference number:
B 6164 - 1
reference_number
B 6164 - 1
Reference number
false
Obverse:
B 6164 - 2
obverse
B 6164 - 2
Obverse
false
Image Number:
JRL0805239dc
image_number
JRL0805239dc
Image Number
false
Image Title:
Talmud commentary
image_title
Talmud commentary
Image Title
false
Subject:
Talmud--Commentaries
subject
Talmud--Commentaries
Subject
false
Creator:
Baruch ben Samuel the Sefardi (12th cent.)?
creator
Baruch ben Samuel the Sefardi (12th cent.)?
Creator
false
Creator Role:
Author
creator_role
Author
Creator Role
false
Source title:
Commentary on Bava metsia
source_title
Commentary on Bava metsia
Source title
false
Section:
31a
section
31a
Section
false
Language:
Aramaic
language
Aramaic
Language
false
Language:
Hebrew
language
Hebrew
Language
false
Script:
Hebrew
script
Hebrew
Script
false
Support material:
Paper
support_material
Paper
Support material
false
Item height:
130 mm
item_height
130 mm
Item height
false
Item width:
93 mm
item_width
93 mm
Item width
false
Folio:
1 / 1 leaf, recto
folio
1 / 1 leaf, recto
Folio
false
Technique used:
Handwriting
technique_used
Handwriting
Technique used
false
Style Period:
Oriental
style_period
Oriental
Style Period
false
Interrelation fragments:
B 6164; Paris, AIU III B 6; Cambridge, University Library, T-S NS 329.199 and Mosseri, V285 probably from same manuscript
interrelation_fragments
B 6164; Paris, AIU III B 6; Cambridge, University Library, T-S NS 329.199 and Mosseri, V285 probably from same manuscript
Interrelation fragments
false
Bibliographic Reference:
Abramson, S., Hananel b. Hushiel of Kairouan (Jerusalem, 1995), esp. pp. 217-20.
bibliographic_reference
Abramson, S., Hananel b. Hushiel of Kairouan (Jerusalem, 1995), esp. pp. 217-20.
Bibliographic Reference
false
Notes:
11 lines. If above fragments are all from the same manuscript, Abramson's hypothesis that the two Cambridge fragments might belong to Hananel's lost commentary on the second half of Bava batra must be incorrect, for the Rylands and Parisian fragments show both contain texts that are from the first half of the same tractate and not Hananel's commentary. Perhaps fragments of Baruch's commentary? Text partially faded.
notes
11 lines. If above fragments are all from the same manuscript, Abramson's hypothesis that the two Cambridge fragments might belong to Hananel's lost commentary on the second half of Bava batra must be incorrect, for the Rylands and Parisian fragments show both contain texts that are from the first half of the same tractate and not Hananel's commentary. Perhaps fragments of Baruch's commentary? Text partially faded.
Notes
false
Discovery site:
Egypt: Cairo: Ben Ezra synagogue
discovery_site
Egypt: Cairo: Ben Ezra synagogue
Discovery site
false
Current repository:
The University of Manchester Library, U.K.
current_repository
The University of Manchester Library, U.K.
Current repository
false
Former repository:
Moses Gaster
former_repository
Moses Gaster
Former repository
false
Category of Material:
Manuscripts
category
Manuscripts
Category of Material
false
Sub-Category:
Fragments
sub_category
Fragments
Sub-Category
false
Image rights:
The University of Manchester Library
image_rights
The University of Manchester Library
Image rights
false
Work rights:
The University of Manchester Library
work_rights
The University of Manchester Library
Work rights
false
Access rights:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Copyright of The University of Manchester
access_rights
<a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/"><img alt="Creative Commons License" style="border-width:0" src="https://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-sa/4.0/88x31.png" /></a><br />This work is licensed under a <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.</a> Copyright of The University of Manchester
Access rights
false
Image sequence number:
B06164-1
image_sequence_number
B06164-1
Image sequence number
false
Image technique:
Digital capture by Gten
image_technique
Digital capture by Gten
Image technique
false
Date image captured:
2008-03-19
date_image_captured
2008-03-19
Date image captured
false
Date: added:
2008-11
date__issued
2008-11
Date: added
false
Metadata language:
eng-GB
metadata_language
eng-GB
Metadata language
false